If the sale agreement is inconclusive, does it raise another question as to the buyer`s ability to pursue the action in violation of the sales contract? This request was met under section 18 of the RERA Act, which states that the developer must compensate the purchaser if he was unable to complete the project and return possession of the property within the time frame set out in the sale agreement or sale agreement. If the developer does not do so, he can file a complaint with the RERA Authority3 and claim damages. If he is aggrieved by the AMF`s order, he can file an appeal with the Court of Appeal for Real Estate Regulation under Sec 44 of the RERA Act 2016. Under the provision of Section 53A, the purchaser is entitled to object to any attempt by the cedant to disturb the purchaser`s legitimate property under the sale agreement, and his position as plaintiff or defendant should not make any difference. The purchaser can only use the shield as a defendant and not as a complainant, he would overcome the spirit of section 53A himself, for it will be possible for an overpowered expropriating the purchaser, even against the parties to the contract, and forcing him to be tried as a plaintiff. Section 49 of the Registration Act stipulates that documents that must be registered either in accordance with Section 17 or under the TPA, unless they are registered, must not concern all the real estate in which they contain; or if an unregord sale agreement, which accompanies the surrender of the property for the benefit of a person in possession, can be presented as proof of the agreement and if an appeal for a particular benefit is based on an unregord sale agreement: the question to be answered is whether an unregord sale agreement acquired by stolen property or executed for the benefit of a person in possession of stolen property , i.e., an agreement that includes a partial benefit, a sale agreement under Article 53A of TPA, can be obtained as proof of the agreement and as proof of the existence of legal action for a given benefit on the basis of such an unregured agreement. The purpose of Section 53A of the TPA gives the defendant the right to protect his property from the vector. It is also available against those who assert their rights under its care, such as heirs, rights holders and final agents. This section should be used in an orderly manner as a defence and not as a weapon of attack. A purchase agreement is an agreement to sell a property in the future. This agreement sets out the conditions under which the property in question is transferred.
The Transfer of Ownership Act of 1882, which regulates participation in the purchase and transfer of real estate, defines the sale contract for sale or sale as follows: [provided that an unregified document, imposed by that Act or the Transfer of Ownership Act of 1882 (4 of 1882), can be obtained as proof of a contract for a defined benefit under Chapter II if the Special Law on discharge of 1877 (3 of 1877) or proof of a guarantee that should not be implemented by a registered instrument.” There are a large number of projects in progress in which the developer may have asked the buyer for more than 10% of the cost of the property under the ATS and may have been donated by him, which were (in the absence of requirement) and are still not registered. The inclusion of this provision was a reason and the reason for this was that there were certain documents that did not make a major difference in terms of the law, title or interest in real estate, whether registered or not. These documents were therefore included in the category covered in paragraph 17(2) because they were not mandatory.